must read” The Presence of Others” P178-189, KNOW Carter’s three steps to integrity are a good judge of consistency between beliefs, speech and action, it does not have any way to address the fact that people often have very different views of right and wrong. In these cases when we might disagree with someone over what is “right” and still consider this person to be acting with integrity. BUt there are also cases when we disagree with oner what is “right” and question that person’s integrity. Add 4th step to determine whether someone we disagree with is acting with integrity. Use three articles in the Ethics section ( “The Rules about the Rules”+ two others) to critique Carter’s definition of integrity. you also can use P184-188 and p198-202.