Peer Review of Food Processing Plant Hygiene Essays Critical assessment of
-Objectives (appropriate and clearly stated)
-Summary (an accurate synopsis of content)
-Introduction (balanced but not exhaustive)
-Written concisely without ambiguity.
-Methodology exposed is sound, appropriate and up-to-date.
-Sufficient detail is given for independent review, but details are covered by references where possible.
-Key details essential to understanding the work are given, unless well established
-Fully supported by evidence presented.
-Speculation is clearly identifiable.
-Conclusions are helpful to the reader.
-Appropriate (complete on key references but not exhaustive)
-Correct and readily available.
Presentation: Two individually bound short reports under the headings given (i.e. one for each report you have peer reviewed)
Length: 500 words Max. (1-2 pages